• Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi

    From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to fusion on Mon Nov 10 09:05:13 2025
    Re: Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi
    By: fusion to Dumas Walker on Sun Nov 09 2025 21:38:00

    can message areas not be grouped in more than one way? i don't recall. perha > in a(n unpleasant) way where two areas listed in two groups use the same fil
    That would certainly be unpleasant. ;)
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to Digital Man on Tue Nov 11 08:37:11 2025
    Re: Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi
    By: Digital Man to fusion on Mon Nov 10 2025 09:36:39

    can message areas not be grouped in more than one way? i don't recall. perhaps in a(n unpleasant) way where two areas listed in two groups use t > > same files?

    They actually can be, by having a sub-board with the same internal code in m > than one message group. This means you can't use the "internal code prefix"
    feature, but it is doable. Some oddity with message scan config / pointers might occur also, I don't recall.

    FWIW, I did try that several years ago and it did cause something "odd" to happen. I don't remember what, but it was enough to make me stop doing so. This would have been well over 10 years ago, IIRC.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP